Hi, On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 03:44:45PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > With the plenitude of low-cost development boards (LCB in following > text) on the market (proverbial Arduino is an example *1), I find it > surprising that none of them is supported in OpenOCD mainline.
RaspberryPi is supported. A driver for GoodFET was recently posted. Arduino is not something that sounds anywhere near joy anymore, can't we all just forget about it finally? > 1. Allows just setting/getting state of signals, so bitbanging is > handled by host (OpenOCD). > 2. Doesn't support pipelined or duplex communication, instead following > half-duplex request-immediate-response protocol for all commands - to > allow use with bitbanging UART for host communication (so once again, we > target to support all MCUs in LCB, from an ATtiny and similar). > 3. Tries to stay within ASCII to facilitate human introspection and > debugging. > 4. Doesn't require configuration and "just works" (frequency limited by > host UART channel, signals are configured during firmware compilation). Doesn't remote_bitbang that's already mainline fit all your requirements? Just use socat to redirect a unix or tcp socket to your serial port and you should be good to go. See tools/remote_bitbang/ for an example client. HTH -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:[email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
