On 12 January 2014 05:40, Evan Foss <[email protected]> wrote: > Why was/is this being removed? >
Robert has spotted that some of the info in the docs is way out of date. It has not been removed, however I think we may need to re-evaluate the comments. In the case of TAPs we still use some of the fuctionality in the str9 flash driver - jtag_tap_by_position/jtag_tap_by_string. The is the comment from jtag_tap_by_string. /* FIXME remove this numeric fallback code late June 2010, along * with all info in the User's Guide that TAPs have numeric IDs. * Also update "scan_chain" output to not display the numbers. */ So we need to either leave the functionality and remove the bogus comments/docs, or fix both. Cheers Spen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
