Hi Andreas,

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:58:22PM +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Peter Stuge <[1][email protected]> wrote:
> 
>   Maybe finally make ftdi drivers the default, rather than ft2232.
> 
>   (If it hasn't already been done..)
> 
> It has, in the sense that the ftdi driver is built automatically as long as
> libusb is available, while ft2232 has to be explicitly enabled. Other than 
> that
> there aren't any "defaults" in OpenOCD.
> Something that could be done is to move the old configs out of sight, to make 
> it
> harder for users to unknowingly choose them over the ftdi ones.

There's one case that still bothers me: xds100v2. We had at least two
reports (the last one is at [1]) talking about the necessity to use
ft2232 before the new driver is able to work. I'll take a look at the
possible differences now. Other than that, especially after the BE
fixes, your driver really shines, thank you very much for it.

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.debugging.openocd.devel/24089

-- 
Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software!
mailto:[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to