On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:50:05PM +0100, Michael Schwingen wrote:
> I don't think this would be a good idea. Even with IPv6 gaining
> popularity, I see IPv4 in LAN installations for a long time.

It's really hard to find a PC that's not dual stack nowadays, even
with wxp.

> And no, I don't consider WinXP obsolete - it has still a lot of live
> left for lab machines used for programming/debugging hardware (not for
> web browsing obviously), so dropping support for these might be bad.

I'm not talking about dropping support. I'm talking about switching
from IPv4-only to IPv6-only. The OpenOCD daemon will still be
accessible both via localhost and from LAN even without any specific
configuration (with link-local addresses).

IPv4-only is not something I'm ready to tolerate, IPv6-only is ok
IMHO. OTOH if one of windows or OpenBSD users provides a clean
implementation dealing with multiple sockets properly I'll be eager to
review and test it.

-- 
Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software!
mailto:[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable 
security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key
security issues and trends.  Skip the complicated setup - simply import
a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=123612991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to