On 02.05.2014 11:25, [email protected] wrote:
>> 3) The BCM2835 SPI controller appears to be flexible enough to use as
>> a JTAG master.  The current SPI driver couldn’t accommodate JTAG.
>> If I go about writing a new driver on the Pi, how should the 
>> interface
>> look to the application (OOCD specifically).  Do you have other JTAG
>> interface that you feel is such a good fit, I could use as an 
>> example?
>> (Or your dream JTAG interface…)
> I do not not much about the hardware limits of the SPI controller 
> inside the Pi but:
>
> My first thought is that it probably would be nice to be able to 
> transfer any numbers of bit, and not be bound to it being dividable by 
> 8.
>
> For SWD, TX and RX can probably be bound together, but the TX needs to 
> be able to tri-state unless a an external buffer is used.
Having an external buffer is a good idea, anyway.

If it works without external logic for simple 3.3V-only-cases, that is
great, but some protection for the PI's ports is nice to have - and for
sub-3.3V targets, it is required anyway.

cu
Michael



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to