On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:50:48PM +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > ... > Uwe> Why isn't the mww broken down as two mwb? > > Digging deeper, both mwh and mwb returned a Verify error, as PLLON set > PLLRDY and readback got 0x3(PLLRDY|PLLON) versus 0x1 (PLLON) written. > > Both > mwb 0x40021003 0x03 ;# RCC_CR[31:24] = PLLON. Read PLLON|PLLRCY > and > mwb 0x40021002 0x0300 ;# RCC_CR[31:16] = PLLON. Read PLLON|PLLRCY > > succeed as expected. I have updated #2702.
Why is it better than mmw? Does mmw not work due to a verify error either? -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:[email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
