On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 25.05.2016 um 02:17 schrieb Tim Newsome:
> > I notice that eg. read_memory() takes address as a uint32_t. Does
> > OpenOCD support 64-bit address spaces? Are there plans to support it?
>
> See for example: http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/1200/
What I'm getting from that is that it's not going to happen without a
serious push, and some desire on the maintainers' part to get it included.
I'll worry about it when I have a 64-bit target, but I am a bit concerned
about this.
Thank you,
Tim
>
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> --
> SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
> untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> _______________________________________________
> OpenOCD-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
