On Friday 04 November 2016 14:51:33 Paul Fertser wrote: > Hi, > > I'm proposing to start active preparations to officially release the > next version of OpenOCD. > > It would be nice to do it as quick as reasonably so that 64-bit > changes can be pulled in to main branch as soon as possible (without > fear of breaking existing targets right before a release). > > So basically I'm proposing to merge whatever is ready for merging and > tag a release. Of course, it's not that simple because we need to try > hard to avoid regressions (users getting OpenOCD from distribution's > repositories expect any update to be no worse for their specific > usecases). > > So if you think you know about something that works in 0.9.0 but > doesn't work in current git HEAD, please do speak up! > > If you would like some nice and non-risky (from regressions point of > view) changes to be reviewed and included in 0.10.0, please say so > now.
I would like to see the following changes merged: 3213: the negative review from Jiri Kastner IMHO is not relevant since it concerns ARMv8 targets, which have to be treated differently anyway. 3639: this enables multi-core debugging in AMP systems. The automatic detection of the access port for the embedded Cortex-M core fails too frequently to be useful. 3076: this is a really useful feature, but it's also a bit dangerous. I would very much like to see it merged but cannot test it with enough depth. If should be neutral if the "-defer-examine" option is not used, so the risk is acceptably, IMHO. There is a pending comment that I will take care of in the next few days. 2869: helpful during production testing and with little risk. I will upload a new patchset that implements the change I requested myself. 3641: I know it's an ugly hack but it fixes a regression with reset and SWD. It's not intended to stay, the whole reset procedure will be reworked in 3720, which is too risky for the current merge window. BR, Matthias > > I know it's annoying many changes are not getting prompt reviews and > merging, some of the changes I've sent myself are still pending > review, but that's how it is currently. Usually if the change attracts > attention from other users and developers, it gets in eventually, so > do not hesitate to nag everybody about everything that you believe to > be important. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
