On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 11:46 -0500, Steven Stallion wrote: > There's a bit more to it than that, but that's what users see most > often. It's important to point out that GDB's remote target support > isn't the best; it's not on par with a local target by any means. It > wasn't until recently that thread names could be assigned/sign for > remote targets (7.11.2 IIRC). To the OP, if you're interested in > extending behavior, I'd suggest starting with a small PoC. I think > you'll get a better idea of the issues at hand once you start > exploring the GDB source.
This would be a problem, as I'm not really a good desktop programmer (I'm working with microcontrollers only), I also know almost nothing about GDB interals. That's why I was hoping that something like that is actually possible now (directly in GDB or maybe with some evil trickery)... Regards, FCh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
