On January 9, 2019 2:46:13 PM PST, Tommy Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >Surely this is something that the target OS needs to support rather >than OpenOCD?
I think it makes perfect sense in the context of a microcontroller. There may not *be* a target OS. What’s in a core dump? Memory. OpenOCD is good at reading that from the target. CPU registers. OpenOCD is good at reading those, too. Threads. If a supported RTOS is in use, OpenOCD is good there too. I see no reason why this doesn’t make sense. No need to talk about semihosting. -- Christopher Head
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
