On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 9:09 AM Tomas Vanek via OpenOCD-devel < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 05.06.2019 16:10, Matthias Welwarsky wrote: > > > > I don't see SWD multidrop as a candidate for 0.11 so that can wait, but > the reset framework is right now so utterly borked that the breakage spills > over into configuration files. Check the R-CarH3 files for bad examples. > > > Neither do I. But the reset framework should be ready for SWD multidrop. > At least I do not want to redesign it again in the future when SWD > multidrop gets widely used. > > > > The adapter rework - not a candidate for 0.11 is it? > > I have no strong opinion here. It seems me ready. > > > > So, without multidrop integration or additional functionality, what is > needed to get the reset stuff in? I can spend some time in finishing it up. > > > Yes, the time. More time. This is what we all desperately need. > Would it be reasonable to compromise and have a stability period for some number of weeks with only bugfixes being merged? Some of the modules that I maintain have a habit of breaking from time to time and I'd like to at least verify that everything is working correctly before the next release is cut. Steve
_______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
