> As I mentioned before, the resulting archives are tagged with a version > number specific to the xPack release.
Ok - so you mean the archive name itself as opposed to the version details which the openocd executable outputs which seems to be the generic openocd one as I mentioned before? And, yes, xPack is probably mentioned elsewhere in the package too. ________________________________ From: Liviu Ionescu <i...@livius.net> Sent: Tuesday 21 January 2020 18:33 To: kristof.mul...@telenet.be <kristof.mul...@telenet.be> Cc: Tommy Murphy <tommy_mur...@hotmail.com>; openocd-devel <openocd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: Building OpenOCD xPack > On 21 Jan 2020, at 20:23, kristof.mul...@telenet.be wrote: > > and unzipped xpack-openocd-0.10.0-14-win32-x64.zip. As I mentioned before, the resulting archives are tagged with a version number specific to the xPack release. I guess there are also some files inside the archive which mention this version. Using these binaries for personal usage is perfectly fine, but please be sure you do not make public releases with archives having these exact names, since they may be confusing for people using the xPack binaries. Regards, Liviu
_______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
