Thanks for the feedback Jens! Sorry if I sounded too harsh.
I get your point now, and I had forgotten the D on OCD meaning. But I think
a zap and a bug and a chip is too much information for a logo. Maybe it
would be better to keep just one of then with the chip.

Cheers,

Martin

Em sex, 9 de out de 2020 16:31, Jens Bauer <j...@plustv.dk> escreveu:

> Hi Martin.
>
> I absolutely agree with you on OpenOCD (Open-On-Chip-Debugger) is for more
> than killing bugs.
> My main reason for suggesting the 'bug' is that the 'D' in OpenOCD is an
> abbreviation for "Debugger".
> -But it's not just a flash-tool either. OpenOCD differs from other
> flash-tools by being a debugger, which makes it stand out a lot (in
> addition to being universal for many targets and many platforms).
>
> A more "describing" name would probably be "OpenOCT", Open-On-Chip-Tool,
> since it has multiple purposes.
>
> That said, I do not think OpenOCD should be renamed; it's had its name for
> a long time and everyone using it knows it by that name.
>
> Maybe it would be better to 'zap' the bug by a "flash" of lightning ? ;)
> -That would include both debugging and flashing - but icons / logos should
> also be easy to understand.
>
> I do like that Kristof is focusing on shape without color; color can
> easily be added and it can easily make a shape more clear.
>
> Personally, I'm using it for flashing Cortex-M based microcontrollers most
> of the time, but at times, I do find myself using it as a debugger and for
> investigating data inside a MCU's RAM or registers (also a kind of
> debugging; eg. verifying that my data are correct - or trying to figure out
> what went wrong).
> I'm only using it for "unlocking" when a MCU is locked from a board
> manufacturer; this is only necessary on flashing the first time, so I
> consider that to be a part of 'flashing', though technically it isn't.
>
> One word that is seen often in relation to OpenOCD, is 'hacking' (meaning
> "making modifications to something, in order to get it to function
> properly"). Basically that would more or less cover both flashing and
> debugging, though it might remove the focus from flashing and debugging.
>
>
> Love
> Jens
>
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:49:45 -0300, Martin Meier wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I haven't developed anything for the OpenOCD, so I don't think my
> > vote should count as a developer. Bus as a "customer", I'd like to
> > say that I like the logo idea from opensource/openhardware
> > communities, because of the relation with the "OPEN" word:
> >
> > https://reelyactive.github.io/images/osi-oshw.png
> >
> > Maybe something like this (but not made in m$paint):
> >
> > or this (unlock your mcu full potential!):
> >
> >
> > Regarding the existing options, I like the options 4 (more dynamic)
> > and 5 (more emphasis on the "OPEN" side).
> > Regarding Jens options (bug image), I liked it at first, but after
> > thinking a while... Although openOCD is a "debugger", it can also be
> > used in production (the reason I found it) and embedded development
> > is not only about killing bugs...
> > But that's just my 2 cents...
> >
> > Thanks for the amazing work!
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > Em qui., 8 de out. de 2020 às 13:19, Spencer Oliver
> > <s...@spen-soft.co.uk> escreveu:
> >> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 10:35, <kristof.mul...@telenet.be> wrote:
> >>> Dear OpenOCD developers,
> >>>
> >>> Let's have a look again at choosing a logo for OpenOCD?
> >>> As you might remember, I've drawn a couple of samples,
> >>> which you can find here:
> >>>
> >>> https://new.embeetle.com/figures/logo_matrix.png
> >>>
> >>> Some of you already voted for a logo:
> >>>
> >>> - Tomas Vanek
> >>> - Anton Krug
> >>> - Antonio Borneo
> >>> - Andreas Bolsch
> >>> - Tommy Murphy
> >>> - Vladimir Zapolskiy
> >>> - Oleksij Rempel
> >>> - Jan Matyas
> >>> - Paul Fertser
> >>> - Tarek Bouchkati
> >>>
> >>> The votes are also listed on the figure (see link at
> >>> the top). Please feel free to:
> >>>
> >>> - Change your mind (just send me a mail to
> >>>   change your vote).
> >>>
> >>> - Make suggestions for a new logo. I'm happy
> >>>   to make new drawings.
> >>>
> >>
> >> thanks they look great - my vote is A6.
> >>
> >> Spen
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenOCD-devel mailing list
> >> OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenOCD-devel mailing list
> > OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to