Hi Antonio Unfortunately, I was about 75% of the way through my review comments when I got this and lost everything and I don't have time right now to redo them... :-|
[cid:726584aa-8372-4100-8235-f8952ef2a30b] Cheers Tommy ________________________________ From: Antonio Borneo <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday 7 March 2021 22:14 To: OpenOCD <[email protected]> Subject: [OpenOCD-devel] Request for review - licenses and SPDX Hi all, I would like to merge the changes to switch openocd licensing tag to SPDX, but I have not received 'enough' feedback/review. The first question is if you agree on the licensing switch itself. Then, most of these changes are just moving/adding license files taken from the FSF. Nothing to review there! But I have added two important files! My second question is about the 'wording' I have used in these files. I'm not a native English speaker nor a lawyer, so your review there is more than welcome. The two files are: - The final text in file 'COPYING' http://openocd.zylin.com/gitweb?p=openocd.git;f=COPYING;h=0e8db929e671 - The new text in file 'LICENSES/license-rules.txt' (partially copied from Linux kernel) http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/5973/3/LICENSES/license-rules.txt For your reference, the whole patch set is here: http://openocd.zylin.com/#/q/topic:spdx Thanks, Antonio _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
_______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
