> On 17 Jul 2023, at 18:41, Tommy Murphy <tommy_mur...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I assumed that all OpenOCD tests were being done with your own xPack OpenOCD. > Are you saying that this is not the case or that you are testing with xPack > OpenOCD *and* this CubeIDE OpenOCD?
The initial report was based on the runs of the µOS++ semihosted unit tests, with the xPack OpenOCD. The short tests using PendSV were performed with the latest CubeIDE, which comes with its own binary for OpenCOD. > And the results with the same configuration (including `cortex_m maskisr`) > are the same or different? Frankly, I'm not familiar with these settings, and I would disregard any initial conclusions and keep only those from the tests performed with CubeIDE. > I presume that the CubeIDE OpenOCD source code is available if it's different > from the master OpenOCD? Yes, they provide the git commit ID used in their build, and the url of the repo used. See the console output in the test report. Liviu
