Also, there appears to be an unrelated issue with the docs around the remote bitbang protocol: https://review.openocd.org/gitweb?p=openocd.git;f=doc/manual/jtag/drivers/remote_bitbang.txt;hb=a35e254c5383008cdacf7838a777f7f17af5eeb1#l48
It says "The eight mandatory functions are encoded in ASCII by assigning a single character to each possible request." and then proceeds to list a lot more than 8 commands. Are they all mandatory (is blink really mandatory)? At least the "eight" should probably be updated to whatever number is actually mandatory. Thanks, Jeremy On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 at 14:56, Jeremy Herbert <jeremy....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tommy (and all), > > My apologies, this fell off my radar. I have just pushed a fix now: > https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/8195 > > Thanks, > Jeremy > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 22:27, Tommy Murphy <tommy_mur...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Just to clarify - I can't see any relevant patch here that addresses the >> 'd' packet duplication/clash: >> >> * https://review.openocd.org/q/bitbang+sleep >> >> I can see the patch that introduced the problem though: >> >> * https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7472 >> >