> At least, I'm still optimistic and happy to hear, that you are considering > this language for OpenOCD. This would probably increase its acceptance among > embedded developers. But be prepared, that people may keep asking you, why > in the hell you are using a new language nobody is familiar with.
Do you categorize Tcl as new? > Harald > > P.S. I should add, that the original source, on which the Ethernut > configuration was based on, the eCos Configuration Tool, uses tcl. I > replaced this by Lua simply because tcl looked a bit old and cryptic to me, > while Lua seems to be more modern and clean. I did post a patch w/my experimental code. One thing to bear in mind is that I've been pushing the OpenOCD target config library. The awareness of that library seems to be very low at the moment and nobody bothers to contribute back target scripts. Is it really realistic to expect the community to use a scripting language for OpenOCD? We'll see if there will be any feedback on the Tcl experiments :-) -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
