> Currently, it would work for a flash at zero, and not at the end. The
> proposed change would make it work at the end, and not at zero. A
> hypothetical flash containing the zero address in its middle would not
> work either way. I don't have immediate ideas of how to account for all
> these possibilities, but the reset vector is near the end, and one may
> expect that to be in flash.

a flash starting at 0 is a common case.

How about:

(addr <= c->base + c->size - 1)


-- 
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to