duane>Today, OpenOCD assumes there is always a target. Perhaps it needs
a "target none"? for that situation.
rick> I would assume that not having a 'target create' line in a config
would be sufficient to indicate no targets.
I prefer *EXPLICIT* indication of no target, thus if one finds "target
none" - one can spit out errors if one accidentally to creates a target.
Rational:
Human Factors - noobs are often confused.
rick> For future use, I could even see allowing multiple interfaces to
be defined at one time.
I could to - but - that is the 0.01% problem. For many - 99.99% of the
time people are talking to one interface.
If they are talking to 2 interfaces - it is not unreasonable to request
they start 2 instances of openocd.
There is a higher chance of somebody having 2 CPUs on a single JTAG
chain (this exists now - ie: BeagleBoard OMAP has DSP + the ARM)
Although to day - openocd does not support the dsp debug stuff.
-Duane.
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
