> Does that mean that you wish to have a tcl script (perhaps named > obsolete.tcl) that implements the obsolete syntax using the new syntax?
I guess what I'm saying is that if someone submits such a patch, I'll certainly commit it. However, I don't suggest documenting or promoting it. Much. It is then an example of what users can write themselves if they so wish to. > That would provide a simple upgrade path for users while still excising the > old syntax from the main code base. It is also clear to the end users that > they are using an obsolete syntax. > > Are there other syntax changes that should be made before 1.0? If so, what > are they? Don't know. If we commit a first obsolete.tcl and there is interest in it, I'll certainly apply followup patches. > > Do you wish me to update the patch to include the obsolete.tcl idea? If you are willing to put this together then I'll certainly commit it. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
