On Dec 16, 2008, at 3:40 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Duane Ellis <[email protected]> wrote:We've talked about it but have not done it. I propose:When Beagle board is reasonably fully supported - we declare Version 1.0.Sound like a plan?I think this is a good goal to focus efforts. That requires Cortex-M8 support too, so we may well be talking 2-3 months into the future(which I think is a good idea) with all the JTAG stuff and syntax changes stabilized.
The JRC support is, in my opinion, a required feature for 1.0. To actually test out the JRC support, we'll need to bring up a target on it. Thus, Cortex-A8 support will get added. I'd be OK with shipping 1.0 with Cortex-A8 listed as experimental.
If we *ARE* doing releases, I'd like to set quality first and then it has to take the time it requires to get all the pieces in place.
We need to avoid feature creep or we'll never ship a release. Hence why I would like to get the JRC support in (we all agreed on that before), but mark the Cortex-A8 support as experimental. That way we don't delay the 1.0 release until that new feature is fully tested, but rather use it to test the JRC and nothing more.
In fact, we could reasonable test the JRC without Cortex-A8 support. That would still meet the goals for 1.0 and not delay the release for a new target that isn't a 1.0 goal.
-- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
-- Rick Altherr [email protected]"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
