On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:21:39AM -0800, Rick Altherr wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2008, at 8:16 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> I get your point.  But if I were to just go and create
>> tools/rlink_dtcas and tools/rlink_speed_table directories and nobody
>> followed on, I'd look a bit silly.  It works the way it is, and at  
>> such
>> a time as a scheme such as you propose is enacted, it shouldn't be a  
>> huge
>> deal to make the necessary modifications to the parts affected by my
>> patch.
>>
>
> Being the organizational neat freak that I am, I would prefer if you  
> went ahead and put the rlink tools in trunk/tools.  I'll locate any  
> others that are already in the source base and move them.  Having  
> _something_ in trunk/tools will mean that future tools would have a  
> defined location and we would request that the patch author place them  
> there.

Ok.  I will proceed thusly, as it appears such a scheme is being enacted
now.

>> It would be helpful, particularly to new people, to have a document  
>> that
>> enumerates how things are laid out and how people are expected to do
>> things.  Particularly for situations such as mine where there are no
>> existing examples, yet, from which to crib.
>>
>
> Agreed.  This should be done before our 1.0 release.
>

When is that?  I get the idea, alternately, that it is soon, and that it
is undefined.  Maybe both are correct.

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to