Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I tried to apply this patch, but it wouldn't apply. Strange.
Nothing happened.
Looks healthy...
How was it generated?
First time I may have text edited the patch file, cutting it out of a
larger one.
This current one attached is generated like this:
svn diff src/jtag/jtag.c > jtag.patch
That last one would apply if you hand entered the filename.
This one should apply without entering the filename.
Thanks,
Dick
Index: src/jtag/jtag.c
===================================================================
--- src/jtag/jtag.c (revision 1261)
+++ src/jtag/jtag.c (working copy)
@@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@
{
if (cmd->fields[i].in_handler(cmd->fields[i].in_value, cmd->fields[i].in_handler_priv, cmd->fields+i) != ERROR_OK)
{
- LOG_WARNING("in_handler reported a failed check");
+ LOG_WARNING("in_handler: with \"in_value\", mismatch in %s", cmd->ir_scan ? "SIR" : "SDR" );
retval = ERROR_JTAG_QUEUE_FAILED;
}
}
@@ -1314,7 +1314,7 @@
/* We're going to call the error:handler later, but if the in_handler
* reported an error we report this failure upstream
*/
- LOG_WARNING("in_handler reported a failed check");
+ LOG_WARNING("in_handler: w/o \"in_value\", mismatch in %s", cmd->ir_scan ? "SIR" : "SDR" );
retval = ERROR_JTAG_QUEUE_FAILED;
}
}
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
