On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 06:32:31PM +0100, Mag. Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2009 schrieb Freddie Chopin: > > I hoped that in such a place people are not as lame as in normal public > > forums... i was wrong... there is a very very old (2 days) post by me > > about stm32primer (in which I post my calls for openocd)... and have you > > by any chance read the documentation for the openocd? haven't you > > noticed, that you should specify not only the INTERFACE configuration, > > but also the TARGET (or BOARD) configuration in which tere are taps > > specified? > > > > 4\/3!! > > well, I subscribed today, so I probably did not get it. Anyway you should > take > a look at your documentation yourself, it says YOU CAN. that is FACULTATIVE. > (ref.: > http://openocd.berlios.de/doc/Simple-Configuration-Files.html#Simple-Configuration-Files > ) > > And, no, I could not smell it, as it is NOT written there that YOU MUST > define > it that way, which would be then MANDATORY and the gentle eader might notice > it. but anyway, thank you for the tip.
I think you're reading that a bit too pedantically. But if the documentation is really unclear, perhaps somebody with the ability and inclination to do so will clear it up. Everybody is always busy, so it might be helpful for you to propose replacement verbiage which still means what it's supposed to, yet resolves the ambiguity that you perceive. Or generate and submit a patch which makes that change. The patch would then be accepted or not. OpenOCD knows nothing about your interface or board until you tell it. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
