I use a JLink to flash my STM32 and I would love to be able to program at the speeds you are seeing! I have been meaning to look at why this is so slow for a while but haven't been able to find any time. I hope to be able to get some of the new instrumentation changes in a give it a try this week.
wrote 232380 byte from file lpm.bin in 262.544495s (0.864362 kb/s) Dylan On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Rob Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:30 AM, SimonQian <[email protected]> wrote: >>> My adaptor is Versaloon(USB2.0 FullSpeed), it's more slower. >>> jtag_khz 565 >>> flash write_image >>> C:/Projects/FreeRTOS/Demo/CORTEX_STM32Fxxx_Eclipse/RTOSDemo/RTOSDemo.bin >>> 0x08000000 bin >>> wrote 27464 byte from file >>> C:/Projects/FreeRTOS/Demo/CORTEX_STM32Fxxx_Eclipse/RTOSDemo/RTOSDemo.bin in >>> 3.375000s (7.946759 kb/s) >>> >>> Does it because that CM3 can only support a slow JTAG frequency? >> >> It would be helpful to get some performances numbers for non-STM32 >> Cortex part... >> >> I haven't dived into the details, but I'll be really surprised if >> performance can't be >> improved significantly by ironing out a few bumps in OpenOCD. >> > > I've got a Luminary LM3S811 eval board, with a CPU and FT2232. > Haven't run it up in a while, and can't remember the first thing > about it, but I'll send something to it in the morning > (just downloading the driver CD again, to get some demo code...) > > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
