On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:09 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Rob Brown <[email protected]> wrote:Øyvind Harboe wrote:I'm seing pitiful performance when programming STM32 flash(9kBytes/ s).It appears OpenOCD uses most of it's time in target_wait_state(), haven'treally done much investigations yet.Has anyone done any work / measurements on Cortex target_write_memory()/flash programming performance they would like to share?What adapter are you using?ZY1000, but I heard that this is the same with ftdi2232 like adapters. From profiling I see that most of the time is "spent" in target_wait_state().I'd like to hear some performance numbers from anyone out there. -- Øyvind Harboe PayBack incident management system Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition http://www.payback.no/index_en.html _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
I haven't looked into any performance aspects of OpenOCD since I'm still more concerned with correct operation. That said, I can take a look at this on the host side. My day job is writing performance analysis tools.
-- Rick Altherr [email protected]"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
