> Maybe the check should be put back anyway, even when we know that 
> it takes 7 or less steps in case someone changes the code later.
>
>   
No doubt that check is needed, or

a function rewrite which changes tms to bit a bit vector, and then 
"bits" (which BTW should be called bitcount to make it clear this 
parameter is not the bit vector)  can be any number and then the 
function could be used to send the tap machine on an arbitrary nearly 
endless journey, including looping.

As written, it is a mine field.

Since I am a dummy, I have experience with "APIs for Dummys".

Dick

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to