On Mar 2, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
The whole OMAP problem, AFICT, boils down to that "someone" has toset aside the time to get this sorted. I believe by rewriting ocd_process_reset and a couple of patches it would be done. The piecemeal crisp questions& incremental patches in the mailing list seems to be making some very slooow progress on the problem.It looks like the sort of problem I'd rather pass up unless there are crisp questions/patches I can comment on or I have the time to really dive into it.-- Øyvind Harboe PayBack incident management system Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition http://www.payback.no/index_en.html
I'd rather they not hijack ocd_process_reset for the entire ICEPICK sequence. I'd like to see:
- ocd_process_reset gets hijacked to handle the 10 TCK on reset problem. I _believe_ this could actually be handled as part of the reset event, but I digress. - Use tap-enable event to do the ICEPICK sequent to bring the CPU online. We purposefully built the infrastructure to handle tap enable/ disable so we should use it. This also handles adjusting the IR length, etc.
-- Rick Altherr [email protected]"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
