On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:36 AM, SimonQian wrote:
Hi, I noticed there is a thread about supporting other programming interfaces except JTAG. How is it going?
There was some talk, but no action. It would require quite a bit of infrastructure work to remove the assumption that every pld and target is attached via JTAG. SWJ seems to be most requested alternate interface, but I'd like to see the OpenOCD internals move to a interface-neutral design. I have ideas of how to make this happen, but time is currently not something I have any spare of. I _might_ be able to get to this sometime in July.
I'll release a program with these support. I tested it on AVR_ISP/JTAG, C51_ISP, C8051F_C2/JTAG, PSOC_ISSP, MSP430_JTAG(non-standard JTAG), and even STM32_ISP(Comm port). If such support is actually planed, I'll try to implement these support in OpenOCD. 2009-04-02 Best Regards, Simon Qian SimonQian([email protected]) ---- www.SimonQian.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
-- Rick Altherr [email protected]"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
