Hi! On Apr 17, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
It should be called darwin. All unix tools I know off call Apple Mac OS X basedThere still needs to be some if(APPLE) endif(APPLE) lines added for static libraries on APPLE.These should be called MACOS_X as Apple is a company, not a product orOS.You are correct. CMake probably has its own platform define however, that it defines automagically on a given platform. I actually don't know what it is on OSX, but I think it is APPLE.
computers this way.
Well I know CMake and I know autotools also pretty well. And I think that replacing one build system, that is working very good, with another one, only for the reason of replacing it wrong. I do not see any technical reason for(but this is easy to do and probably will only ever effect MICHAEL.)I'm solely on OS X and could be affected, but I tend to use dynamic libraries.Somebody please commit it.There is still some open discussion on whether or not the project wants to.Cool. But until people actually use it, they are not in a position to discuss it. So it is a catch 22 that I think is best broken by making easy to try.
replacing the build system here. (maybe I just miss something)I could also come and say that you should switch to git because it is superior to svn. But svn is working so why replace it? I think it would be just wasted time, and this time would be better invested in improoving openocd itself.
Cheers Esden -- My blog: http://www.esden.net My projects: http://open-bldc.org, http://multicopter.org Projects I am involved in: http://ng.uavp.ch
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
