There is as much (or as little) functionality as existed in the past. I think its better to have --with-ftd2xx-includes and --with-ftd2xx-libs options, but this an area where my autotools expertise still remains a bit fuzzy. However, the FTD2XX libraries are x86-only and proprietary; are you building on something else but targeting that architecture? :)
--Z On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 10:13 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote: > I didn't look at the patch but is there a way to force the directory to > aid cross-compiling? > > Nico Coesel > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] Namens > > Zach Welch > > Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2009 9:59 > > Aan: openocd-development > > Onderwerp: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] improve Linux ftd2xx > > configure-timesupport > > > > Hi all, > > > > The attached patch rewrites the configure script section that > > handles detecting the Linux FTD2XX libraries. It no longer > > assumes anything, so it may cause breakage on some > > distributions. I tested it against installed copies of > > 0.4.13 and 0.4.16 on Gentoo, along with both static and > > shared options under --with-ftd2xx-linux-tardir. > > > > In truth, I do not think this can do any real harm, as it > > makes the same kinds of assumptions as were made previously. > > It simply verifies that the files are actually there, so > > anyone that had it working before now will have already been > > setting up the proper LDFLAGS or other magic. > > > > It also changes the output to be more configure-like. Please apply. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Zach > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
