On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Michael Bruck <[email protected]> wrote: > The following files don't have an svn:eol-style set and should IMO be > set to native: > > PATCHES > src/jtag/dummy.c > src/target/target/mega128.cfg > src/target/target/at91sam9260_ext_RAM_ext_flash.cfg > src/target/arm_adi_v5.c > src/target/arm_adi_v5.h > > > In addition there are these files that have no eol-style property and > are probably best marked as native as well: > > src/server/httpd/Stylizer.java > contrib/openocd.udev > testing/examples/STM32-103/readme.txt > testing/examples/SAM7X256Test/prj/sam7x256_reset.script > testing/examples/SAM7X256Test/prj/sam7x256_rom.ld > testing/examples/SAM7X256Test/prj/sam7x256_jtagkey.cfg > testing/examples/SAM7X256Test/prj/sam7x256_ram.ld > testing/examples/SAM7X256Test/prj/eclipse_rom.gdb > testing/examples/SAM7X256Test/prj/eclipse_ram.gdb
Fixed the above. > > > A range of files is marked as eol-style LF for reasons that are not > obvious (to me): > > src/jtag/rlink/init.m4 > src/jtag/rlink/call.m4 > src/server/httpd/html2tcl.sh > src/server/httpd/build.sh > guess-rev.sh > tools/rlink_make_speed_table/rlink_make_speed_table > tools/rlink_make_speed_table/rlink_make_speed_table.pl > tools/st7_dtc_as/st7_dtc_as.pl > tools/st7_dtc_as/st7_dtc_as > bootstrap > > > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
