On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Michael Bruck <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Nico Coesel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> are embedded firmware engineers. Most embedded firmware engineers I know >> have very little to do with C++, OO programming and the STL / boost >> libraries. These people probably won't be able to fix OpenOCD without >> climbing the learning hill first. My vote would be for OpenOCD to stay a C >> program. > > Most embedded firmware engineers I know had no problem to figure out > the basics of C++. > A compromise here would be to limit the C++ features we use. I've heard that before! It never works out. Everybody has their own pet C++ feature that they just have to use. Before long, most developers sort of muddle through things without sort of understanding that C programmers take for granted. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
