> > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Magnus Lundin <lundin at mlu.mine.nu > <https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development>> wrote: > >/ Ųyvind Harboe wrote: > />>>/ > />>>/ Stop trading USB performance for Zylin performance, stop changing the > />>>/ JTAG > />>>/ API, improving the implementation is nice though. > />>>/ Listen to Laurent this time, he is right !! > />>>/ > />>/ > />>/ This is a red herring. I do *NOT* intend to trade USB performance for > />>/ zylin performance. > />>/ > />>/ > />/ > />/ But you have done exactly that. > / > I'm not done yet. This is svn head so there are some speed > bumps in the road. > > >/ You submitted untested code, you did not do any performance testing, > />/ impossible because iit did not work, you were told early what the > />/ performance implications would be and that turned out to be exactly true > and > />/ the things you are removing is GOOD code and GOOD design. Some parts are > />/ currently unused, that does not make them bad, some parts are used and > they > />/ are important. > />/ > />/ You have definitley messed up my work. > />/ > />/ No I do not want to hang in there :( > / > I understand. But hang in there, I'm working exclusively on this > now to sort out the remainder of the problems. > > I'm confident I'll win you over once the dust settles. > > If you give me a bit of breathing room I'll be able to concentrate better > and finish more quickly and with fewer mistakes. > We do not ask you to find an alternative. WE ASK YOU TO COME BACK TO "in_handle" "in_value" "_mask" CONCEPT !
We do not have added "in_handle" "in_value" "_mask" CONCEPT just for fun or just to be less readable ! Laurent http://www.amontec.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
