Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> Stop trading USB performance for Zylin performance, stop changing the JTAG >> API, improving the implementation is nice though. >> Listen to Laurent this time, he is right !! >> > > This is a red herring. I do *NOT* intend to trade USB performance for > zylin performance. > > But you have done exactly that. > I'm doing this for a couple of reasons: > > - remove thousands of lines of code > - improve legibility > Depends on what parts you are used to working on > - yes - it improves performance of embedded hosts. This is not a bad > thing as long as I make sure that I don't deteriorate performance of > other interfaces when I'm done. > > Hang in there. If you give me a bit of breathing space, I'll see if I can't > get the worst of this done with in the next couple of hours. > > You submitted untested code, you did not do any performance testing, impossible because iit did not work, you were told early what the performance implications would be and that turned out to be exactly true and the things you are removing is GOOD code and GOOD design. Some parts are currently unused, that does not make them bad, some parts are used and they are important.
You have definitley messed up my work. No I do not want to hang in there :( _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
