On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Magnus Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I am still waiting for any coherent analysis supporting the recent > changes. I have been asked for, and given, arguments for keeping the basic > openocd design, but for the changes it is still only "we will fix it, no > analysis whatsoever".
There is a simple explanation for this: there has not been enough time to write this up. (I think we have been over the fact that this project was badly executed enough times...) I'm going to start writing up a revised scheme for postprocessing that addresses the issues brought up in the list. It should be a day or two before I have something to present. This proposal will address performance on high CPU power, high bandwidth, slow roundtrip(USB & TCP/IP) and also low CPU power, high bandwidth, low latency scenarios. issues. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
