On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:21 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote: [snip] > I had mentioned this a while back. I've been thinking through the > approach and I'm slowly settling on a C++ implementation that would > essentially be a rewrite. That said, I believe an autoconfig > mechanism could be done on the current implementation, but it would > probably be pretty difficult. I'll start drafting the formal proposal > for my idea.
Assuming you agree that a C++ implementation amounts to a new project, I think you might be better off starting a new project on berliOS (with a new mailing list and SVN repository). I would subscribe and might even be talked into contributing, but I would want to see the C++ style guide as much as any design or implementation proposals. ;) Personally, I think this list is starting to see enough traffic about the existing implementation that discussions of a new C++ branch here will cause confusion that affects the community's focus and direction. While announcements would be okay, I think we need to show a concerted effort on producing high-quality release of the existing implementation. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
