Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I think this makes sense.
>
> It is roughly along the lines of using a base class where the
> subclass implements the guts and the base class implements
> the fn called by normal users.
>
> Along the same lines, Michael Bruck was trying to find a
> reasonable way to reuse the instruction simulation for arm11
> so we could get single stepping support for all arm11 targets...
>
> I believe that Zach is trying to round up a 0.2 release soon though. Could
> be good to do this afterwards.
>
> With a 0.2 out of the door, it should be easier to do these sorts of
> things in svn head.
>
>
Yes, and no.
Many of these changes are only debug messages, so I would categorize
them as cleanup without functional impact.
So the need to be conservative is rather small here.
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
