Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: > Thank you very much for your review, Rick. I asked for comments because I > would prefer applying a cleaner patch. I would like to know if we can merge > flash_address and command_address functionality, but in order to tackle this, > I'd like to know if command_address would also be useful in the intel case. > I'll take a look, but it might take some days.
Anyway, it will need to be based on databook reading, since you are the only one who has a board with such a flash setup. As long as the usual (x8 as x8 / x16 as x16) case is not broken, your patch is an improvement anyway, no matter if x16_as_x8 works on intel or not. It makes sense to avoid two code paths if one should be sufficient for all flashs, even if we can not test it now. cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
