Dean Glazeski wrote: > Hey all, > > Can anyone give me insight on these files: > > openocd.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary > /usr/lib64/openocd/ecos/at91eb40a.elf > /usr/lib64/openocd/ecos/at91eb40a.elf > These are *TARGET* files, the "package tool" you have is *WRONG*HEADED*, or mis-informed - it sees the file as an ELF, then wrong assumes it is an *ELF* target for the intended HOST. You might want to ask the packaging people how to identify such files My hunch is, they have *NEVER* thought about this situation!
> openocd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/openocd/contrib/libdcc/example.c > openocd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/openocd/contrib/libdcc/dcc_stdio.c > openocd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/openocd/contrib/libdcc/dcc_stdio.h > Again, I think the "package tool is wrong" or mis-informed, this is a "cross compilation package" - these are example source files that a user of this tool might use - they are not *HOST* files, but are instead, *TARGET* files and are rightfully included in the package. > openocd.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/openocd.info.gz > > > This I don't know enough about TexInfo stuff to answer - sorry. -Duane. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
