On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 00:18 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
> Zach Welch wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:53 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote: 
> >   
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>     
> >>> Info : J-Link compiled Feb 20 2006 18:20:20 -- Update --
> >>> Info : JLink caps 0x3
> >>> Error: J-Link command EMU_CMD_GET_MAX_MEM_BLOCK failed (-110)
> >>>       
> >> Open OCD seems to get reasonable ansvers from first two JLink commands.
> >>
> >> The /* query hardware maximum memory block */ should not be run for this
> >> version, I had removed it in my patch. Next patch will use results from
> >> JLink caps to select what info to query.
> >>
> >> I am waiting for more info from Segger about version diffrences and
> >> endpoints.
> >>     
> >
> > How are we doing with this patch?  It looks like we have made some good
> > progress this week, so I don't want the effort to stall.
> >
> > What are the thoughts about committing your latest version?  Even if
> > more changes may be pending, it seems that your work has improved things
> > for folks with some devices, so I think we have made constructive
> > progress from where we were before now.  If nothing else, we should get
> > some more testing feedback. ;)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Zach
> >   
> There is a set of new patches that has been tested by Michael Fischer, 
> as far as i know there were no problems.
> 
> There are still things that should be fixed in the resethandling in 
> jtag_add_reset and minimizing the differences between ft2232 and jlink 
> behaviour.
> But still would suggest that the following patcches are commited. They 
> are not untested.

I will apply them here and see if they magically cure my own woes.
Regardless, I think these changes should be committed in some for,
though I can see various ways that I would like to clean your code.
Would you mind my taking a pass over them before I commit them?

Incidentally, do you think this might also solve the problem that was
just reported by Dylan Reid?  I have cc'd him in the hope that he will
try your patches and report the latest results.

Cheers,

Zach
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to