On May 27, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2009, David Brownell wrote:

On Monday 25 May 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009, David Brownell wrote:

I see messages about needing to increase some GDB timeout/ interval. But that's foolishness, since I'm not even working with GDB when they start
spamming me.

This is indeed really irritating.

What about those messages being displayed only when a gdb connection is
actually in use?

That'd be a start; it'd address the symptom, which is
better than nothing.

Here it is. I'd call it a stop gap for 0.2.0 until a proper post-0.2.0
solution is developed.
<openocd.patch>_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Committed revision 1933.

--
Rick Altherr
[email protected]

"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
 -- Unsigned



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to