On Sunday 31 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
>
> > What I would like to see is that we push funky rules into board/target
> > config
> > files and keep the reset_config implementation as simple as possible.
One reason I dislike that model is the knowledge that
configuration/installation errors are one of the top
causes of pain with *any* software package.
Making configuration more complex ("funky" conditional
rules certainly do that) guarantees more such errors.
> > There are pieces missing today, such as the board/target config files
> > ability to detect capabilities in the interface.
>
> It seems simpler for the authors of the interfaces and boards files to
> simply declare what the hardware can do, and OpenOCD should work out the
> best capabilities to use. That seems simpler for script authors than
> trying make them detect things in the configuration files. Or am I
> missing something here?
I can't see that you're missing anything.
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
