Hmm.... my whole idea with using 32 bit sizes was that *no* bit array library would be needed....
I don't think there are *any* places in OpenOCD where bit array code is needed or even particularly convenient if we had 32 bit sizes. My only (slight) concern with 32 bit would be that perhaps 64 bit targets(a looong way off) would be better off w/64 bit sizes, though creating some JTAG helper fn's on top of a 32 bit API would be easy peasy. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
