Stranger and strangerer.... part #2 was cut out.... here goes again:
>From the point of performance I think we can switch. The other problem is the installed ftd2xx base. I think it makes a problem to install a libftdi driver over an existing ftd2xx driver. Before the user can use a new windows version of OpenOCD based on libftdi, they must deinstall the ftd2xx driver with FTClean. This is possible and was working here. But how does the functionality looks like if we compare libftdi against the ftd2xx driver? Will the new high speed hardware supported by the libftdi driver too? -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
