On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 17:37 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 15 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > > Others have pointed out that this licensing violation occurs only when > > distributing the binaries, so I do want to provide assurance that I have > > no problem supporting these types of features -- for developers to use > > in local builds _only_. I think such support is great, in fact. > > So ... no particular issue with the patch I used to start out > this thread? We could maybe achieve closure on this issue, at > least for the upcoming release? :) > > A key change was the advice-to-packagers: > > | That said, the OpenOCD developers would also like you to follow a few > suggestions: > | 1. Send patches, including config files, upstream. > | 2. Always build with printer ports enabled. > | 3. Use libftdi + libusb for FT2232 support. > > Previously #3 implied the D2XX option was viable, and went on > there for some length... > > I think I'll re-spin that patch to point out that the performance > difference is marginal, which seems to reflect *current* reports > (vs a-few-years-old, or perhaps bitbang mode not mpssse).
I just committed it, but further patches are welcome. My "import from email" script support seems complete, so bring on the patches. --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
