> Alain Mouette wrote: > >/ Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ escreveu: > />>>/ Out of sheer curiosity: how will your Qt wrapper be licensed? :) :) > />>>/ > />>/ Whichever license is appropriate, both for OpenOCD and FTD2XX. LGPL > />>/ may be? > />/ > />/ The Qt licence is strict GPL, so it cannot be anything else... > />/ > / > No, not anymore. Please see http://www.qtsoftware.com/downloads. > > Thanks, > Caglar > > >/ Alain/ // My intent is not to start a traditional license flame war. I won't continue this one.
Qt is LGPL, not GPL ! I really think OpenOCD should pass to LGPL or GPL-with-exception license. LGPL (Lesser GPL) would be better. Laurent http://www.amontec.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
