Guess what, OpenOCD wasn't started so YOU can get paid. If you don't like the way OpenOCD is managed, get out.
You're quite an asswipe. ________________________________ From: Zach Welch <[email protected]> To: Spencer Oliver <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 23:05:43 Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] License On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:57 +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote: [snip] > GPL is important, but i do not understand people's objections to adding an > exception - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > who exactly is this hurting? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you like to kick me in the nuts, while saying things like this? The effect would feel little different. Such exceptions hurt professional software developers that want to make a living developing free and open source software -- like me. I think they hurt the entire free and open source software movements, actually. > It would be a shame to have to fork openocd. Yes. It would be a shame to see it forked over this, when clear technical solutions have been offered that comply with the GPL and provide exactly the same functionality. I am not ashamed, other than by the willingness of members in this community to attempt to retroactively revise a _legal_document_ that was accepted by contributors like myself. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
