2009/6/24 Spencer Oliver <s...@spen-soft.co.uk>: > >> > What is the situation with the ZY1000, I assume that all >> modifications >> > to the OpenOCD source tree are public, but can you >> guarantee that the >> > code running on the Zylin1000 does not link to anything that is >> > nonopen and thus violates the GPL ? >> >> zy1000 runs eCos which is GPL compatible. Jim Tcl was a >> problem, but I fixed that license. zy1000 runs openocd unmodified. >> >> > > so why can we not fix the licence here?
*all* copyright holders have to agree. For Jim Tcl that was 7 contributors and I was able to contact them all. You have to *convince* everybody that there is such a thing as a *better* license for OpenOCD. Change the license to *what*? I haven't seen a proposed license change that would could be torn apart for analysis. What about unwanted side effects? Do you want closed source target support? Do you want closed source interface drivers? -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
