On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote: > About the flame wars - since you are a developer I see those twice a > month, along with some people departing the team. What is your great > contribution to the code? Moving the scripts around in the tree, > documentation updates, changing a==12; to a == 12; or u8 to uint8_t > surely takes lot's of updates, so you probably already win by the > numbers. How about some self-criticism, Mr. > Self-Proclaimed-Leader-Of-The-Community?
Notice the complete disregard of technical arguments here. That's a good sign that the person making the argument has no real contribution to make, beyond invective. Or perhaps it's the old "how to inflate one's ego, at the expense of someone else" thing... > It's clear to me, that many here have forgotten the main IDEA. The IDEA > behind OpenOCD was to provide a free and open tool for ARM developers Under the GPL. From the very first public release, that has been part of it. You download it, and the GPL is there. That brings along with it certain rules. > that could be used with FT2232-based JTAGs. Now some think the idea is > to be Uber-GPL-we-don't-care-for-the-users. You're the ONLY one advocating a "we-don't-care-for-X" mindset. And the problem is that your "X" includes (a) the license agreed to by at least fifty developers, (b) those developers, (c) common courtesy. You're also *falsely attributing* a mindset to other people. That's often called "lying". _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
